In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has provided key clarifications regarding the rules on citizenship resumption, particularly in cases involving individuals who have obtained foreign citizenship. A bench comprising Justice Abhay Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih presided over the case. This interprets the provisions of the Citizenship Act.
The Court highlighted that under Section 9 of the Citizenship Act, the termination of Indian citizenship occurs automatically. This is when a person acquires foreign nationality. This loss of citizenship is not a voluntary renunciation but rather a consequence by “operation of law.” As a result, the Court ruled that children of such individuals cannot apply for the resumption of Indian citizenship under Section 8(2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955. This provision only applies to those whose parents voluntarily renounced their Indian citizenship. Hence, allowing their offspring to seek resumption of nationality within one year of reaching adulthood. However, this right does not extend to children of individuals who lose citizenship through automatic cessation.
The judgement also addressed the scope of Article 8 of the Indian Constitution. This relates to the rights of persons of Indian origin residing abroad. The Court clarified that individuals born outside India after the Constitution’s commencement cannot claim Indian citizenship. It is solely because their grandparents were born in undivided India before partition.
The ruling through clarifying rules on citizenship resumption came in response to an appeal by the central government. It was against a Madras High Court decision that had granted citizenship rights under Section 8(2) to a Singapore-born individual. The respondent, whose parents were originally Indian nationals before acquiring Singaporean citizenship, sought to reclaim Indian nationality. He also argued for citizenship under Article 8, citing his grandparents’ birth in pre-independence India. However, the Supreme Court rejected these claims, upholding the central government’s appeal.
This ruling has reaffirmed the strict legal framework governing the acquisition and resumption of Indian citizenship in cases of foreign nationality.
10 Comments
Delhi High Court Interprets Section 531(2)(a) Of BNSS …
[…] a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court has interpreted Section 531(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023. They indicated that only appeals pending before the enforcement of the new law will continue. This […]
Supreme Court Directs Bar Association Election Disputes To Civil…
[…] be taken to civil courts, not constitutional courts under Article 226. The bench, consisted of Justices Abhay S Oka and AG Masihn. They specifically addressed the case involving the Alipore Bar Association. This ultimately […]
Supreme Court Emphasises Settlement Over Punishment In Cheque
[…] Supreme Court recently reiterated the primary purpose of criminalising cheque bounce under the Negotiable […]
Madras High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Private …
[…] bench comprisedJustice MS Ramesh and Justice Sunder Mohan. They emphasised that the ED had initiated proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act […]
Supreme Court Seeks AG's Assistance In Petition Against West …
[…] under Article 361 of the Constitution should not preclude an investigation. The bench, composed of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, permitted the petitioner to include the Union of India in […]
Bombay High Court Strikes Down Maharashtra's Exemption For …
[…] and disadvantaged groups. This provision also extends to specific categories of schools such as Kendriya Vidyalaya, Navodaya Vidyalaya, and Sainik Schools, as well as to those not receiving any aid from the government or local […]
Supreme Court Grants Interim Relief To Homebuyers Of Stalled …
[…] bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan reviewed several petitions from homebuyers contesting the recovery proceedings […]
Supreme Court Permits NGT Pune To Form Virtual Bench Due To…
[…] a significant move to address the functioning challenges of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in Pune, the Supreme Court has allowed the formation of a bench with one member participating […]
Supreme Court Issues Notice On PIL For Online Access …
[…] Supreme Court has recently issued a notice on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that seeks to enable advocates and litigants to inspect digitised judicial records of High Courts […]
Supreme Court Ruling: Vendor Cannot Re-Sell Property Pending…
[…] a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court held that a vendor who has executed a sale deed cannot execute another deed for the same property […]