By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 57 CrPC: Maximum Detention Time for Arrested Persons in India
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 57 CrPC: Maximum Detention Time for Arrested Persons in India
CrPC

Section 57 CrPC: Maximum Detention Time for Arrested Persons in India

Apni Law
Last updated: July 1, 2025 4:07 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)
Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)
SHARE

Code

Contents
ExplanationIllustrationCommon Questions and AnswersQ: Can a person be detained for more than 24 hours before being produced before a Magistrate?Q: What happens if the Magistrate orders further detention beyond 15 days?Q: Does this section apply to all arrests?

No police officer shall detain in custody a person arrested without warrant for a longer period than under all the circumstances of the case is reasonable, and such period shall not, in the absence of a special order of a Magistrate under section 167, exceed twenty-four hours exclusive of the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to the Magistrate’s Court.

Explanation

This section states that no person can be detained in custody for more than 24 hours, excluding the time taken for the journey from the place of arrest to the Magistrate’s court, without being produced before a Magistrate.

The Magistrate, upon examining the arrested person, has the power to:

  • Release the person on bail.
  • Order further detention for a specific period, not exceeding 15 days.
  • Remand the person to judicial custody.

Illustration

Imagine a person is arrested at 10 AM on Monday. They are taken to the police station and interrogated. By 10 AM on Tuesday, they need to be brought before a Magistrate. The journey time between the police station and the court is 2 hours. In this scenario, the person can be detained at the police station for 22 hours (24 hours minus 2 hours journey time) before being presented to the Magistrate.

Common Questions and Answers

Q: Can a person be detained for more than 24 hours before being produced before a Magistrate?

A: No, unless the journey time from the place of arrest to the Magistrate’s court exceeds 24 hours.

Q: What happens if the Magistrate orders further detention beyond 15 days?

A: The person can challenge this order in a higher court.

Q: Does this section apply to all arrests?

A: Yes, this section applies to all arrests made under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

You Might Also Like

Section 205 CrPC: Magistrate’s Discretion to Dispense with Accused’s Personal Attendance

Section 202 CrPC: Postponement of Issue of Process – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 37 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Designated Police Officer.

Section 83 CrPC: Attachment of Property of Absconding Person – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 72 CrPC: Warrants – Who They’re Directed To

TAGGED:ArrestCriminal Justice SystemCriminal Procedure CodeCrPCDetentionIndia LawIndian judiciaryJudicial ProcessLaw EnforcementLegal RightsMaximum TimePolice PowersSection 57
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article IPC Section 498A: Cruelty By Husband Or Husband's Relatives IPC Section 498A: Cruelty By Husband Or Husband’s Relatives
Next Article Examining The Legal Validity Of Election Manifestos Examining The Legal Validity Of Election Manifestos
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal's ED Custody Extended in Liquor Policy Scam: Key Updates
News

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s ED Custody Extended in Liquor Policy Scam: Key Updates

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea By Bilkis Bano Rape Case Convicts Challenging Remission Revocation
Supreme Court Seeks Government Response On AYUSH Drug Approval Rules Amid Patanjali Misleading Ads Case
Supreme Court Issues Notice On Bibhav Kumar’s Bail Plea In Swati Maliwal Assault Case
Supreme Court Rules Out Entertainment Tax On Internet Service For Cinema Ticket Bookings
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Land Acquisition: Procedures, Compensation, And Legal Battles

Land Acquisition under Public Private Ownership Model Attracts Benefits: Calcutta High Court

How To File A Case Under The Motor Vehicles Act

Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Compensation for Deceased’s Negligent Driving: Supreme Court

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?