By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: CrPC Section 258: Power to Stop Proceedings in Specific Cases
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > CrPC Section 258: Power to Stop Proceedings in Specific Cases
CrPC

CrPC Section 258: Power to Stop Proceedings in Specific Cases

Apni Law
Last updated: May 27, 2024 9:51 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

CrPC Section 258: Power to Stop Proceedings in Specific Cases

Contents
1. Code:2. Explanation:3. Illustration:4. Common Questions and Answers:

This section empowers the Magistrate to stop proceedings in specific cases where it is deemed necessary or expedient.

1. Code:

Section 258: Power to stop proceedings in certain cases.

Where, upon consideration of the case, the Magistrate is satisfied that—

  • the offence alleged to have been committed is not triable by him;
  • no sufficient grounds exist for proceeding further with the case;
  • the case should, for any other reason, be transferred to another Magistrate or Court;

he may, in his discretion, stop further proceedings in the case and—

  • if the offence is triable by another Court, he may direct the case to be sent to such Court;
  • if the case should be transferred to another Magistrate, he shall forward it to such Magistrate, with his reasons for so doing;
  • in any other case, he shall record his reasons for stopping the proceedings.

2. Explanation:

This section allows the Magistrate to exercise discretionary power to stop proceedings in specific cases, ensuring that justice is served efficiently and effectively. This power is applicable when:

  • The offence is not within the Magistrate’s jurisdiction: If the Magistrate lacks the legal authority to try the alleged offence, they can stop proceedings and direct the case to the appropriate court.
  • Insufficient grounds for proceeding: When there is a lack of evidence or other grounds to support the prosecution, the Magistrate can halt further proceedings.
  • Transfer to another Court or Magistrate: Circumstances may necessitate transferring the case to a different court or Magistrate, for instance, due to a conflict of interest or for more efficient handling.

3. Illustration:

Imagine a case where an individual is accused of theft but the value of the stolen items is below the threshold for a particular court’s jurisdiction. The Magistrate, recognizing this, can use Section 258 to stop proceedings in their court and direct the case to a court with jurisdiction over petty theft. This ensures the case is heard in the appropriate forum.

4. Common Questions and Answers:

  • Q: Can the Magistrate stop proceedings on their own initiative?
  • A: Yes, Section 258 grants the Magistrate the discretion to stop proceedings even without a specific application from any party.
  • Q: What happens to the accused if proceedings are stopped?
  • A: If the case is transferred, the accused will continue to face charges in the new court. If the proceedings are stopped without transfer, the accused is effectively discharged from the charges.
  • Q: Are the accused’s rights considered during the decision to stop proceedings?
  • A: Yes, the Magistrate must consider the accused’s rights and ensure fairness in the process. The decision to stop proceedings should be based on sound legal reasoning and not arbitrary.

You Might Also Like

Section 178 CrPC: Place of Inquiry or Trial in Criminal Procedure

Section 212 CrPC: Particulars of Time, Place, and Person – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 398 CrPC: Power to Order Inquiry – Code of Criminal Procedure

Section 48 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Obligation Of Person Making Arrest To Inform About Arrest, Etc., To Relative Or Friend.

Section 304 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Officer In Charge Of Prison To Abstain From Carrying Out Order In Certain Contingencies.

TAGGED:Court ProceedingsCriminal LawCriminal Procedure CodeCrPCIndian LawIndian legal systemJudicial DiscretionLaw EnforcementLegal ProcedureLegal ResearchPower of CourtSection 258Specific CasesStay of Proceedings
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article DMRC Win: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award in Favor of Anil Ambani firm in Delhi Airport Metro Case DMRC Win: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award in Favor of Anil Ambani firm in Delhi Airport Metro Case
Next Article CrPC Section 263: Record in Summary Trials – Code of Criminal Procedure
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
IUML Challenges CAA in Supreme Court, Alleges Flaws in Protecting Persecuted Minorities
NewsSupreme Court

IUML Challenges CAA in Supreme Court, Alleges Flaws in Protecting Persecuted Minorities

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Section 479 BNSS Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Convicted Prisoners: Kerala High Court
Supreme Court Reaffirms Doctrine of Lis Pendens: Defences of Bona Fide Purchaser and Lack of Notice Not Applicable
Supreme Court Directs Uttarakhand To Decide On Patanjali’s Ayurvedic Products Within Two Weeks
Union Of India Rebuked By Supreme Court Over ED’s Misleading Arguments Against PMLA
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Who Is Eligible for Free Legal Aid Under the Legal Services Authorities Act? (Section 12)

Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women

Calcutta HC Takes Up Pleas for Independent Probe in Law College Rape Case Amid SIT Investigation

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?