Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Section 317
Code: Section 317
Explanation:
This section of the BNSS mandates that any interpreter appointed by a Criminal Court to interpret evidence or statements must provide a truthful and accurate translation. This ensures fairness in legal proceedings by ensuring that all parties understand the proceedings and evidence presented.
Illustration:
Imagine a case where a witness speaks only Hindi, and the court proceedings are conducted in English. An interpreter is appointed to facilitate communication. This section requires the interpreter to accurately convey the witness’s testimony in English, without altering or misrepresenting the meaning.
Common Questions and Answers:
- Q: What happens if an interpreter misinterprets evidence?
- A: Misinterpreting evidence can lead to serious consequences for the interpreter, including contempt of court charges. The court may also consider the impact of the misinterpretation on the case and potentially order a retrial.
- Q: Who is responsible for appointing interpreters in Criminal Courts?
- A: The court itself is responsible for appointing interpreters, ensuring they have the necessary qualifications and language proficiency for the specific case.
- Q: Can a party to the case choose their own interpreter?
- A: While parties may suggest potential interpreters, the final decision rests with the court. This ensures impartiality and prevents potential bias from influencing the translation process.
