By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 258 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Judgment Of Acquittal Or Conviction.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNSS > Section 258 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Judgment Of Acquittal Or Conviction.
BNSS

Section 258 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Judgment Of Acquittal Or Conviction.

Apni Law
Last updated: February 25, 2025 6:24 pm
Apni Law
7 months ago
Share
Section 258 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Judgment Of Acquittal Or Conviction
Section 258 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Judgment Of Acquittal Or Conviction
SHARE

Code:

(1) After hearing arguments and points of law (if any), the Judge shall give a judgment in the case, as soon as possible, within a period of thirty days from the date of completion of arguments, which may be extended to a period of forty-five days for reasons to be recorded in writing.

Contents
Code:Explanation:Illustration:Common Questions and Answers:

(2) If the accused is convicted, the Judge shall, unless he proceeds in accordance with the provisions of section 401, hear the accused on the questions of sentence, and then pass sentence on him according to law.

Explanation:

This section lays down the timeframe for delivering a judgment and the procedure for sentencing after a conviction in a criminal case.

Subsection (1): This subsection mandates the Judge to deliver a judgment “as soon as possible” within 30 days of completing the arguments. For specific reasons, this period can be extended to 60 days. This ensures timely justice delivery and prevents undue delays in the judicial process.

Subsection (2): This subsection deals with the sentencing procedure. If the accused is found guilty (convicted), the Judge must hear the accused on the question of sentence, unless the Judge chooses to proceed under Section 401 (which deals with the imposition of a sentence without hearing). Subsequently, the Judge will pass a sentence on the accused according to the law.

Illustration:

Imagine a case where a person is accused of theft. After the arguments are complete, the Judge delivers a judgment within 30 days, finding the accused guilty. The Judge then proceeds to hear the accused’s perspective on the sentence. The onsidering factors like the accused’s background, mitigating circumstances, and the gravity of the offense. Finally, the Judge sentences the accused according to the applicable law, potentially including imprisonment, fines, or other forms of punishment.

Common Questions and Answers:

Q: What are the specific reasons for extending the judgment delivery time to 60 days?

A: The BNSS doesn’t explicitly list the specific reasons. However, they could include complex legal issues, extensive evidence review, or the need to consult with experts.

Q: What does it mean to hear the accused on the question of sentence?

A: This implies that the accused is given an opportunity to present their arguments, plead for leniency, or explain any mitigating factors that might influence the sentence.

Q: When can the Judge proceed under Section 401?

A: This is typically done in cases where the sentence is predetermined (like a fixed fine) or when the nature of the offense clearly warrants a specific sentence.

You Might Also Like

Section 517 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Exclusion Of Date On Which Court Is Closed.

Section 311 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Record In Trial Before Court Of Session.

Section 233 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Procedure To Be Followed When There Is A Complaint Case And Police Investigation In Respect Of Same Offence.

Section 222 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Prosecution For Defamation.

Section 194 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Police To Enquire And Report On Suicide, Etc.

TAGGED:AccusedConvictionCourtCriminal ProcedureExtensionJudgeJudgmentLawLegal ProcedureLegal ProcessSection 401SentenceSentencingTime LimitTrial
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 250 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Discharge Section 250 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Discharge.
Next Article Section 261 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Compliance With Section 230 Section 261 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Compliance With Section 230.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Passport
Jammu & Kashmir High CourtNews

Passport Can Be Issued Despite Pending Criminal Case Only By Court: J&K High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Garrison Engineer’s Signature On Pleadings Deemed A Curable Defect: J&K And Ladakh High Court
Any Authority Could Be Empowered To Issue Certificates For Muslim Marriages : Karnataka Waqf Board To HC
CJI DY Chandrachud Warns of Risks in Adoption of AI, Highlights Facial Recognition Technology
Supreme Court Declares Royalty Under MMDR Act Is Not A Tax
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Understanding The Evolution And Legal Framework Of Dowry In India

No Strict Proof Needed for Brides Claiming Gold Entrusted To In-Laws: Kerala HC

How To File A Complaint With The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal?

Driving Without Insurance? Know the Penalties Under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 146 & 196)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?