Section 244 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Where It Is Doubtful What Offence Has Been Committed.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Section 244

Code: Section 244 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

Explanation: This section deals with the situation where the nature of the act committed by the accused is ambiguous, and it is unclear which specific offense the proven facts constitute.

  • Sub-section (1): This subsection allows the prosecution to charge the accused with multiple offenses related to the ambiguous act. They can either charge the accused with all possible offenses or choose to charge them with any combination of these offenses. All these charges can be tried simultaneously. Alternatively, the prosecution can charge the accused with only one of the possible offenses, which is known as charging in the alternative.
  • Sub-section (2): This subsection states that even if the accused is charged with only one offense, and the evidence presented during the trial suggests they committed a different offense that could have been charged under sub-section (1), they can still be convicted of the offense proven by the evidence.

Illustrations:

  • (a): If a person is accused of an act that could be either theft, receiving stolen property, criminal breach of trust, or cheating, they can be charged with all four offenses or any combination of them.
  • (b): In the same scenario, if the accused is charged only with theft but the evidence suggests they committed criminal breach of trust or receiving stolen property, they can be convicted of either of these offenses.
  • (c): If a witness gives contradictory statements under oath in two different proceedings, they can be charged with intentionally giving false evidence, even if it is not clear which statement is actually false.
Also Read  Section 88 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Release, Sale And Restoration Of Attached Property.

Common Questions and Answers:

  • Q: Can the accused be convicted of an offense they were not charged with?

    A: Yes, if the evidence presented during the trial proves that the accused committed an offense different from the one they were charged with, but falling under the scope of Section 244(1), they can be convicted of the proven offense.
  • Q: What is the purpose of allowing alternative charges?

    A: The purpose is to ensure that the accused can be convicted of the offense that is actually proven, even if the initial charges were based on an incomplete understanding of the facts.
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp

Never miss any important news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Related News

Leave Your Comment

Recent News

Editor's Pick

Apni_Law_Logo_Black

Let Us Know How Can We Help You

Fill Out The Form Below. Our Team Will Contact You Shortly

Disclaimer